Magnus Carlsen Withdraws from FIDE World Rapid and Blitz Tournament Over Dress Code Fine
Magnus Carlsen, the world-renowned chess champion, made headlines recently when he decided to pull out of the FIDE World Rapid and Blitz tournament after being fined for wearing jeans. The global governing body of the sport, FIDE, offered Carlsen the option to change his attire, but he chose to withdraw from the event, citing it as a "matter of principle."
Carlsen’s decision to exit the tournament was not a spur-of-the-moment choice. In an interview with the Take Take Take app, he expressed his frustration with FIDE, stating, "My patience with FIDE was not very big to begin with. I’m too old at this point to care too much. They can enforce their rules. That’s fine by me. My response is, I’m out, f** you. I don’t think anything more has to be said."
The chess champion went on to accuse FIDE of threatening players who wanted to participate in the Freestyle Chess Grand Slam Tour, a series of chess events organized by Jan Henric Buettner in various cities around the world. Carlsen alleged that FIDE actively discouraged players from signing up for the tour, warning them that they would be excluded from the World Championship cycle if they participated in the Freestyle events.
Following Carlsen’s withdrawal, fellow chess player Hikaru Nakamura hinted at a potential conflict brewing between players and FIDE. Nakamura supported Carlsen’s stance and criticized FIDE for attempting to control players’ choices regarding tournament participation. He predicted a "war" between FIDE and players who preferred the Freestyle events over FIDE-sanctioned tournaments.
In response to the allegations made by Carlsen and Nakamura, FIDE CEO Emil Sutovsky issued a statement denying any threats towards players and emphasizing FIDE’s role as the governing body of chess. Sutovsky clarified that FIDE’s only requirement was that any tournament claiming to be a World Championship must be approved by FIDE.
The controversy surrounding Carlsen’s withdrawal sheds light on the power dynamics within the world of chess and the ongoing debate over players’ autonomy and tournament choices. As the chess community awaits further developments, it is clear that a new chapter in the sport’s history may be on the horizon.