Friday, April 24, 2026
HomeChess NewsCarlsen's 'Gaslit' Remark About Chess.com Under Scrutiny After Four-Year-Old Comment Resurfaces: 'NOT...

Carlsen’s ‘Gaslit’ Remark About Chess.com Under Scrutiny After Four-Year-Old Comment Resurfaces: ‘NOT Given or Told’ – Firstpost

Date:

Related stories

Khelo India Chess Tournament Attracts 200 Players to Paulshof

Khelo India Chess Tournament: A Thriving Showcase of Talent...

Julien Song Launches Global Adventure on May 4

Get Ready for an Epic Showdown: Julien Song vs....

Magnus Carlsen’s ‘Gaslit’ Claims Scrutinized Amidst Cheating Scandal Revelations in Netflix Documentary

Magnus Carlsen’s Cheating Scandal Claims Under Scrutiny in New Netflix Documentary

In a shocking revelation from the recently released Netflix documentary Untold: Chess Mates, world chess champion Magnus Carlsen has expressed feelings of being “gaslit” by Chess.com amid the fallout from the 2022 cheating scandal involving American Grandmaster Hans Niemann. The documentary revisits the dramatic events of the 2022 Sinquefield Cup, where Carlsen suffered a surprising defeat to the then-19-year-old Niemann, leading to accusations of cheating that sent shockwaves through the chess community.

Carlsen, the reigning world No. 1, revealed that he felt misled by Chess.com, the leading online chess platform, which had promised to investigate Niemann’s play. Despite Niemann’s admission of cheating in online games during his youth, Chess.com found no evidence of wrongdoing in over-the-board competitions, including the pivotal match at the Sinquefield Cup held in St. Louis, USA. This lack of evidence left Carlsen feeling frustrated and betrayed.

“I felt that I’d sort of been gaslit a bit by Chess.com,” Carlsen stated in the documentary, a sentiment echoed by his father, Henrik Carlsen, who suggested that Chess.com may have overpromised in their commitment to support the five-time world champion.

The documentary features interviews with key figures, including Chess.com co-founders Danny Rensch and Erik Allebest, who assured Carlsen they would uncover evidence to back his claims against Niemann. However, a resurfaced comment from Rensch on Reddit raises questions about the validity of Carlsen’s feelings. In the post, Rensch stated that Carlsen had not seen Chess.com’s cheat detection algorithms and was not provided with a list of known cheaters, suggesting that Carlsen acted independently based on his own knowledge.

“MAGNUS has NOT seen chesscom cheat detection algorithms,” Rensch wrote. “He is and has completely acted 100% on his own knowledge (not sure where he got it!) and desires to this time.”

The controversy surrounding the Sinquefield Cup scandal has had lasting implications for both players and the chess community at large. Chess.com, which acquired the Play Magnus Group around the time of the scandal, has maintained a close relationship with Carlsen, further complicating the narrative.

As the chess world continues to grapple with the fallout from this scandal, the documentary sheds light on the complexities of trust, integrity, and the pressures faced by top players in an increasingly scrutinized sport. The revelations from Carlsen and the responses from Chess.com are sure to fuel ongoing discussions about ethics in chess and the future of competitive play.

As the chess community watches closely, the question remains: how will this scandal shape the future of the game and the relationships between its key players?

Latest stories